|
malcom [27060. Posted 28-Jul-2010 Wed 12:44] View Near Messages
I said in an earlier post that I could not find the climax3 channel HC movies.....Well tried again and this time I have found them.....It`s been said many times before but it just don`t make sense that subscribers can see hard core on the computer but not on the TV channel itself........
Only difference is the viewing card number is a longer pin number than the TV one..........I wonder what excuse Ofcom would have if the TV PIN number was as many digits as the card number........
PS. I note that Playboy have licence for two more channels..
Adult 3 and Adult 4.........I read somewhere that they are chat phone line channels. Possibly along the lines of SXTV but girls only........ malcom [27058. Posted 27-Jul-2010 Tue 12:15] View Near Messages
So the government has no plans to relax regulations on terrestrial broadcasts..........He could have said no plans to relax regulation on tv broadcasts but he did not.......This could mean they have plans to relax none terrestrial regulations or am I reading too much into it in the name of hope.......:) malcom [27057. Posted 27-Jul-2010 Tue 11:02] View Near Messages
re:rainman........Hi....Yep you chose the wrong channels......Just one nights viewing of the playboy 6 could yield the same let down results......However there are some series that are pushing the code to the limit and byond......However they are still very much soft core but with some treats on an occasional basis.....They do advertise sexier and filthier than ever and have to admit they are telling the truth but there is not near enough of it.....So don`t be tempted to buy......
You have watched TVX and red hot which means I assume you are registered......I note on red hot mums channel they have started a live show phone in series girl-n-girl about 4 night a week from midnight till 2am.....
Now...There synopsis claims it is girl n girl explicit and uncensored. Yes I know heard it all before......However in view of explicit material appearing on the set of channel I currentl have it could be that red hot are moving up a notch.....I am not registerd so it would cost me a fiver plus £12 registration fee..Perhaps you may feel like risking a fiver to see if their claim are anywhere near true for that live phone in show........I suspect thay may actually censor via the banner with the phone numbers hiding some explicit action......
I still feel something has changed with regard to the adult channels and there defiance really of the strict code regulations....They must know thay can get away with stronger material that falls short of true hard core but goes much further than ever previously seen on those channels..... malcom [27046. Posted 23-Jul-2010 Fri 12:11] View Near Messages
re- IanG said.....
rainman, long time indeed! I think you missed the trick re adult channels...your TV subscription gets you `free` access the real stuff on their respective websites. Oh but of course, Ofcom don`t allow them to tell you that...! What`s that bit about "no interference"...?
Yes..Thats what I was informed. However I cannot find any free HC on the supposed web site.......Just free samples if you download the files which I will not do.......I thought it was streaming HC video that was available.......If so I wish someone could decipher what links to get at it on climax3..... malcom [27045. Posted 23-Jul-2010 Fri 12:04] View Near Messages
re-rainman....
A few weeks ago i took the plunge out of curiosity to subscribe to the playboy set of channels.......No minimum contract. In practice though due to a months notice being required two months is what you have to pay for mimimum......I was intending to cancell by now but am still entertained by some of the harder soft on at present.....So I am still paying for the moment
You say you found the same old rubbish......Me too over the last three evenings and this evening does not look any rosier either....
Having said that there are series on those channels being aired that are quite good. Its down to trial and error and sitting through some gunge however....There is a series with the word "daughter" in the title look out for them.......There was a night on one channel with "spunk" in the title with sevearl different episodes through the night......And that is what was shown...
I don`t recommend anyone take these channels as a serious alternative to HC.....However i am impressed and encouraged by just how far they are pushing the envelope compared to 5 yaes ago......
I don`t know if you joined just for a nights viewing or monthly......You do need several nights or longer to sort out the good from the rubbish....
malcom [27041. Posted 23-Jul-2010 Fri 05:50] View Near Messages
re-simcha......
In the name of education recent past sex type education shows have shown much stronger explicit material than you have recently observed.
The sort of stuff being shown on the soft adult channels now blows Ofcoms code out of the water even though it is not full blown HC......Past couple of nights have been pretty tame however....
Ofcoms excuse for continuing a R18 ban is truly pathetic.....As you say youngsters today by one means or another see more porn than porn enthusiasts do.....About time Ofcom and the Government ministers that pull their strings grew up...... malcom [27006. Posted 9-Jul-2010 Fri 09:07] View Near Messages
IanG.......Organisations like Ofcom are designed to fuck the law......So called independent when in fact they are Government puppets.......Regulators are a way the governments can flout the law and not seem to get the blame.......
Ultimately its down to the adult broadcasters - Togther they could raise the funds for a legal challenge But.......They don`t seem to have the drive to change anything unless it`s falling into their lap...... malcom [27002. Posted 8-Jul-2010 Thu 11:16] View Near Messages
IanG said: malcom, haven`t we always argued that the `not quite R18` material on `adult` TV can be no more dangerous to the under eighteens than full-on R18?
---------------------------------
Indeed.......I have always believed bog standard soft core to be more of a risk let alone near HC as it leaves the viewer unsatisfied thus sexually frustrated.......Not a good idea........
What interests me is the broadcasters are now more confident in pushing the envelope at times.....Why are they confident at this moment in time....Where as before they were scared stiff of Ofcom .........
Its been what some five years since I took at look at the soft channels so i am seeing stuff new to me as well as the bog standard awful old stuff......I don`t know for how long the broadcaters have been showing some improved stuff.......Anyone know......I get the feeling they have been at it for quite a while and if Ofcom wanted to stop it they would have done so by now......
PS..Asked before but can anyone say what ever happened to Paul Tavener??????? Is he still around........
malcom [26989. Posted 7-Jul-2010 Wed 03:39] View Near Messages
Well. I don`t know what is going on or has gone on regarding Ofcom and the adult broadcasters in relation to the interpritation of the so called new code.......One thing for sure something has chanegd between the original code release and todays interpritation of it by the adult channeles......R18 certainly thus far not allowed.......Bloody close at times in some series to R18 is it appears being allowed and as it is so persistant regular and far removed from what was allowed 5 years ago it must surely be with a nod and a wink or what ever from the regulators............
Change of attitude from a subscription point of also....No 12 month contracts........Permanent £10 reduction for July subscribers only and one advert offering 12 day 6 channels for 1 penny!!!!!!
Is this a sign of desperation for a falling subscriber base or an attempt to cash in for the future better programming.....All speculation.......
Does this mean R18 may be on the cards sooner or later!!!! Wish I knew!!! What is clear from what i have seen over the past few weeks is that the ofcom insistance of no R18 is looking more and more ridiculous because at times they are so close to it.......In terms of lesbian stuff I have seen some that would be classified as HC...It is clear the broadcasters are not in fear of being fined for what they are showing.......5 years ago they most certainly would have been..... malcom [26972. Posted 2-Jul-2010 Fri 14:13] View Near Messages
Ah.Think I have it......Yellow stars don`t appear until mouse is moved over them......
Another problem now. Don`t know how to find my own submission......CENSORSHIP malcom [26971. Posted 2-Jul-2010 Fri 14:05] View Near Messages
Shaun:
Have registered. Have logged in. Still cannot vote. No yellow stars apppear. Just greyed out stars and a comments box...........
PS> By the way my little efort is under the heading of CENSORSHIP...... malcom [26969. Posted 2-Jul-2010 Fri 05:26] View Near Messages
I have been to the Freedom site and entered a suggestion about Censorship and Ofcom but cannot work out how to actually vote for or against other suggestions......I go to the details but where do you vote where are the voting links....???????? malcom [26951. Posted 22-Jun-2010 Tue 11:50] View Near Messages
The DOGS are back......Only been viewing soft channels a short time less than a month but until last night there were no channel logo`s (DOGS) on any of the 6 channels I have been viewing....Until now.....
When did they go how long have they been off and I wonder why the sudden return......Just another piece of curiosity on my behalf....:)
malcom [26950. Posted 22-Jun-2010 Tue 11:46] View Near Messages
IanG....Hi......I wasn`t refering to your open letter as such.....If i read correctly you invited Ofcom to come on the site and read comments which of course would be insults about them on a personal basis.....That`s what i meant.....regards.... malcom [26945. Posted 21-Jun-2010 Mon 13:30] View Near Messages
Ref IanG. Personally I wouldnt direct Ofcom to view insults as they will simply disregard your letter completely.....Be patient bite your tounge and challenge them in a none confrontational way.......As an ex civil servant the more people like Ofcom are insulted the more they dig there heels in....Best of luck with your corespondence with them........
PS.Thank`s to you and Dave for the welcome back postings the other day...... malcom [26944. Posted 21-Jun-2010 Mon 13:30] View Near Messages
Re: Dave said....Does anybody know if Ofcom defines rules on PIN implementation or is the current nonsense just down to to the way Sky have decided to do it, with a `better safe than sorry, got to keep the nutters happy` design approach.
I believe its all down to Ofcom not sky.......It doesn`t make sense that ordinary 18 rated films cannot be viewed via sky during the day from their movie channels yet adult stuff recorded on the hard drive in the evening rated 18 which includes some shall I say hard soft images can be viewed via the pin during the day. Also youngsters that look old enough can enter a cinema during the day and view 18 rated films......
The Ofcom regulation are about as dumb as they can get......
malcom [26926. Posted 17-Jun-2010 Thu 08:37] View Near Messages
Been watching repeats of new look SXTV live series.......Does anyone know how old that series is and if they still do new real live editions of SXTV live from time to time.....
A couple of the repeats are very old pre new broadcasting code and infuratingly they cencored a dildo penetration scene that originally they had let through even after the new code........ malcom [26922. Posted 16-Jun-2010 Wed 11:08] View Near Messages
re dancing monkey:...
Exactly. I like HC but I also like soft if it is creativly made and erotic with reasonable picture quality......HC can get very very boring simply because of its crudity and lack of erotism in most cases.
At the mo I am watching some UK SC out of curiosity to see what changes in strength and quality has been made since the new code......It has certainly changed for the better SC wise and I suppose thats why they are making enough money to consider 3D even.....Also having no annual contract in force and yet be able to pay monthly is a sensible move.......If its not to tast then not much is lost financially
Also it is a wrong assumption that everyone wants to turn to the internet for porn.....I certainly don`t like using a computer as a TV.......Also having been bitten virus contamination wise its also a concern for me when looking for free stuff......Porn and the internet is a definite no no for me........ malcom [26917. Posted 15-Jun-2010 Tue 11:49] View Near Messages
Oh dear......So ofcom have given Television X and Red hot channels a licence for 3D porn channels....... :) There is also a licence for a second "Adult" channel........ These soft stations must be doing pretty darn well in spite of no HC.......
Television X 3D
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/tvlicensing/cs/2011.htm
Red Hot TV 3D
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/tvlicensing/cs/2010.htm
malcom [26912. Posted 14-Jun-2010 Mon 13:07] View Near Messages
ref: simcha.
Actually i find the harder stuff any time of the night now......But as you say they do switch back to old ways on some progs........Old series of course is the same old rubbish......Don`t know what you are sampling but I am sampling 6 channels.....Short term commitment......
I agree it is about time technology was introduced to make pin control more secure so as to take away any excuses from Ofcom........As long as the channels make enough money I expect they won`t bother.......
malcom [26911. Posted 14-Jun-2010 Mon 12:56] View Near Messages
Hi Dave. Almost afraid to say to much as you know some people sit in waiting to report things.......Here goes......Going back to just before the code was announced some soft programs were pushing out stronger stuff glimpses like you say.......Then after the code was announced it all went to ultra ultra soft. Rare to see anything anatomical below the waist.....
Now its back to as it were before the code was announced only a lot more frequent.......Not afraid to show erections or close up female anatomy but not parting of the lips so to speak......Female close ups common on certain channels.....Oral sex behind a screen in shadow exept the shadow is not alway as shadowy as it perhaps should be...Colour breaks through which in effect is on the brink of HC.....
Picture quality often leaves a lot to be desired.......Summing up........Soft channels yes they still are....But at least the subscriber gets more value than I have ever seen on UK soft channels......It`s been what about 4 years since I have taken a looksee at whats available now and was surprised considering the state of fear the soft channels were in a while back......
I`m not recommending such channels just observing that things have changed in the right direction......Reluctant to name the channels just in case......Lots of pin control every time a new prog starts it reverts to ask for pin number.....Had not used to be that pin mad that`s why I was wondering if it is all with the blessing of Ofcom providing they use the pin control extensivly......
PS.....What happened to Paul tavener.......Does he ever post now.....I know I rarely do as my interest was the R18 issue and that got shot down by Ofcom......I do lurk from time to time though....
malcom [26905. Posted 13-Jun-2010 Sun 11:52] View Near Messages
Not posted fo a while!!!!! For the first time since the new broadcasting code I have taken a look at some of the soft channels.......Things have certainly changed since then......Not HC indeed not but much stronger than a few years back......With all the pin hassle have Ofcom relaxed the rules officially or are the broadcasters once again trying to push the envelope.....
|
